Independent Review

Need someone outside the work to say what it can actually support?

Prova can review an existing evaluation design, analysis, report, or important claim and provide a signed professional judgment of what holds, where the limits are, and what remains uncertain.

The reviewer must remain free to reach an unfavorable conclusion. Your organization remains responsible for what to do with the finding.

Design or existing evidence

What needs an independent review?

Two review types

Choose the kind of independent review

Before evidence is collected

An existing evaluation design

Question, protocol, measures, sample, comparison, analysis plan, and implementation conditions.

Design Review
Before a claim is used

An existing claim or body of evidence

The claim, materials used, source locations, method, other plausible explanations, and limits.

Evidence Review
Can Prova remain separate from building or substantially improving what it will judge?
If the answer is no, Prova can still help improve the work, but that help will not be presented as an independent review.

Independence

The arrangement must protect the judgment from the interests around it.

The question, standard, materials, conflicts, fee, sharing rules, and signing responsibility are agreed before the review.

How independence is protected

01What is reviewed

The design, claim, conclusion, or set of materials is defined.

02How independence is protected

The question, standard, fee, materials, conflicts, and sharing rules are fixed.

03What Prova concludes

A named Prova professional owns and signs the conclusion.

04What the client decides

The client remains responsible for what to do with the finding.

What Prova will not do

Prova will not help create or substantially revise the work and then present its review as independent.

Prova can still help improve the work, but that help cannot later be presented as an independent review.

What the buyer receives

A signed conclusion that shows the support, limits, and responsible language.

The purpose is not decorative certification. It is a professional judgment another person can inspect.

Sample deliverable anatomy

Illustrative example — not client work

Independent Evidence Review

Claim reviewed: Participants are more likely to remain employed six months after completion.

ConclusionPartially supported

What supports it

  • Completion records
  • Employer follow-up
  • Six-month survey

What limits it

  • 42% follow-up rate
  • No comparison group
  • Different job-market period

What can responsibly be said

Among participants reached at six months, most respondents reported that they remained employed.

What cannot be said

The current evidence does not show that the program caused higher six-month employment.

Signed byNamed Prova professionalIllustrative signature block
This facsimile shows the anatomy of a possible review. It is illustrative, is not client work, and is not a conclusion about a real program.

Explore the full Signed Independent Review example

What a review can cover

Review the design before evidence is collected, or review the evidence before a claim is used.

Design Review

Before data collection begins

  • What the design can describe, compare, or credibly attribute to the program.
  • The assumptions and risks that could change those conclusions.
  • What would need to change before stronger conclusions were possible.
Evidence Review

Before a claim is used

  • What the agreed materials support and what they only suggest.
  • Which definitions, populations, periods, comparisons, and alternative explanations matter.
  • What additional material could change the conclusion.

AI-assisted review

AI may help search, compare, and trace more of the agreed material.

The reviewer checks the sources behind important findings and owns the signed conclusion.

Explore Prova AI

A practical first step

Start by agreeing on what the review would need to examine.

The first conversation clarifies the question, materials, standard, timing, independence requirements, and whether a bounded review is appropriate.

Discuss a review